Legal
Intake that leaks, contract review that takes three days, client status emails that require a paralegal to manually check each matter. These are process problems, not staffing problems. We build AI systems that fix the process.
Every system we build for legal is designed for confidentiality from the start: no training on client data, private deployment options for Am Law firms, and documented data handling you can show a client if asked.
Tell us about your document workflow.
Six specific systems for intake, document work, and client communication.
Phone or web intake collects matter details, generates a qualified lead summary, and flags the data fields needed for a conflict check. Staff receive a structured intake report, not raw notes.
Extracts specified clause types, flags deviations against your standard playbook, and produces a redline summary. Works against your actual contract templates, not a generic model.
Search across case files, deposition transcripts, and discovery documents in plain language. Answers include citations to the specific document and page. Trained on your uploaded case library.
Sends status updates at defined milestones, follows up on outstanding document requests, and escalates to the attorney if a client does not respond after a set interval.
Reads deposition transcripts, produces a structured summary of testimony, flags inconsistencies against prior statements or other depositions, and highlights passages by topic.
Retrieves relevant case law from your uploaded jurisdiction-specific case library. Returns citations with excerpts. Not a substitute for Westlaw, a fast first pass across your own precedent.
Attorney-client privilege does not disappear because a third party provides AI software, but it can be compromised if that software logs, trains on, or transmits client communications in ways that break the confidentiality chain. Three things matter:
Solo practitioners without paralegal staff
The workflows we automate assume enough volume to justify the build. A solo practitioner handling 20 matters at a time does not generate enough repetitive document work for the investment to pay off. We will tell you this on the discovery call.
Firms wanting a ChatGPT wrapper with no training on their playbooks
Generic AI tools already exist. What we build is trained on your contract templates, your precedent, your intake playbooks. If you want a general-purpose AI assistant, use one of the off-shelf tools. They are cheaper and ready today.
Tell us which workflow: intake, contract review, or document analysis — is the biggest drag on your team. We will reply within one business day with a rough scope and price range.