How we work
Most AI projects fail because the scope is vague, the data is worse than expected, and nobody finds out until week ten. Our five-phase process is designed to surface those problems early, when they're cheap to fix, and to ship working software to production in a predictable window.
The structure is the same whether we are building an AI agent, a retrieval system, or a full SaaS MVP. What changes is the depth of each phase, not the sequence. You always know which phase you are in, what comes out of it, and what it costs.
1 week
What we do
What you get
A 2-page scope document and a written go / no-go recommendation. If the project is not viable, you find out now, not eight weeks in.
3–5 days
What we do
What you get
A full technical architecture document. Every decision is written down with the trade-offs. Your engineers can read it and understand why we made each choice.
3–8 weeks
What we do
What you get
Working software every week. By the end of the sprint cycle you have a fully tested, production-ready system with eval scores you can actually read.
3–5 days
What we do
What you get
A live system with a monitoring dashboard, a runbook, and a handoff meeting where we walk your team through everything.
Ongoing, optional
What we do
What you get
A system that improves over time. Optional, month to month. You can end it any month, no lock-in.
We quote a price range after Discovery. We don't move the goalposts mid-project. If scope changes, we discuss it before any extra work starts.
Not status updates. Not slide decks. Every Friday you see the software running against real data. If something is off, you tell us Friday and we fix it Monday.
At close: architecture doc, runbook, deployment guide, and a walkthrough session. Your team can maintain the system without us, and we verify that before we call it done.
The single most expensive moment in an AI project is the one where everyone realises, in week ten, that the data was never good enough to support the idea. Discovery exists to move that moment to week one, where it costs a conversation instead of a budget. That is why we run a real data audit before quoting a fixed price, and why we are willing to recommend against a project we could have billed for.
The weekly demo is the other load-bearing habit. A status update describes progress; a demo proves it. When you watch the system run against real data every Friday, scope drift and quality problems surface while they are still small. There is no week-ten reveal because there is no week without a working build to look at.
Evaluation runs through the whole engagement rather than sitting at the end as a formality. We define what good looks like during Architecture, build the harness alongside the system, and measure against it every sprint. By the time you reach QA, the question is not whether the system works but whether the numbers clear the bar you approved, and you can read those numbers yourself.
Maintenance is optional on purpose. Models change, traffic changes, and an unwatched AI system drifts. We are happy to run that watch for you, but the handoff is built so your own team can do it instead. The measure of a good handoff is that you could fire us the next day and nothing would break.
Describe your project below. We'll read it, reply within one business day, and schedule a one-hour discovery session if it looks like a fit.