Loading…
Staffing & Recruiting
The recruiter bottleneck is not judgment. It is the volume of repetitive work before judgment is needed. Sourcing 300 profiles to find 8 worth calling. Re-entering candidate data an ATS could have captured. Writing job descriptions from scratch for every new req.
We build the AI systems that handle intake, sourcing, screening, and reporting, so your recruiters spend their time on the work that actually closes placements.
Tell us about your workflow.
Six specific systems for sourcing, intake, screening, and placement workflows.
Scrapes LinkedIn and job boards, scores candidates against the job requirements, and sequences outreach automatically. Your team reviews the shortlist, not 400 raw profiles.
Phone or web intake captures structured candidate data and writes it directly to your ATS. Candidates answer questions once. No recruiter re-entry required.
Hiring manager submits an intake form describing the role. The AI produces a formatted, compliant JD in minutes, not a blank page your recruiter has to fill.
An AI voice agent conducts the initial phone screen and flags only qualified candidates for human recruiter review. Routine screening calls stop consuming your team's time.
A new job description runs against your existing candidate database and returns a ranked match list. Placements from candidates you already sourced, not new pipeline every time.
Pulls weekly placement activity, pipeline status, and submission metrics from your ATS and generates the client summary, formatted and ready to send.
Firms where the ATS already solves the workflow
Bullhorn AI, Greenhouse, Lever, and other modern platforms have built-in automation for many of these workflows. We build custom systems when the platform does not fit how your team actually works, not to replace tools that are already doing the job.
Solo recruiters without process volume
AI sourcing and intake automation pays off at volume. A one-person desk placing 10 roles a year will not get meaningful ROI from a custom build. Talk to us when placement volume makes the manual work genuinely expensive.
Teams that want to skip ATS entirely
Our systems write into ATS platforms: Bullhorn, Crelate, PCRecruiter, Vincere. If your workflow is spreadsheets only and you are not ready for structured data, the build will not hold.
Tell us which part of your placement process consumes the most recruiter time. We will reply within one business day with a rough scope and price range.