Loading…
Migration
Bubble doesn't support the API structure you need. Voiceflow's logic editor can't handle your call routing complexity. Chatbase won't let you tune the retrieval or add reranking. You've done everything the platform allows and it still doesn't do what you need. This is the ceiling, and it's predictable. Every successful no-code build eventually hits it.
We take the workflow you've built in a no-code tool and rebuild it in production-quality code, preserving the business logic, replacing the platform constraints, and giving you a system you own outright. No platform dependency, no per-operation billing at scale, no black-box retrieval you can't inspect.
Tell us what you're building.
Six source platforms, each with a specific target architecture and specific limitations we replace.
API rate limits, no real-time logic, performance ceiling at scale. Bubble's database and API connector constraints become blockers once your product needs custom auth flows, complex joins, or high-frequency background jobs.
Limited prompt control, no custom memory, can't integrate proprietary APIs without workarounds. Voiceflow's logic editor breaks down when call routing complexity exceeds what the visual editor can express.
No access to retrieval tuning, chunking strategy, or reranking. You can't see what's being retrieved or why answers are wrong. When hallucination or poor answer quality is the problem, the platform gives you no levers to fix it.
Per-operation cost at scale, no error recovery, fragile sequential execution. Workflows that work fine at 1,000 operations per month break or become expensive at 100,000.
Vendor dependency on n8n Cloud, can't customise the execution engine, limited to the node types the platform provides. Self-hosting n8n solves some of this, migrating to custom code solves the rest.
No complex business logic, performance limits on large datasets, data ownership constraints. These tools are excellent for getting to a first user. They're not designed for building a product with paying customers who have non-trivial requirements.
Five phases from discovery to cutover. Each produces specific outputs before the next phase starts.
Map your current no-code logic to the target architecture. Every flow, every integration, every edge case documented before a line of code is written. This is where we find the things the no-code platform was hiding from you.
Export and restructure data from the no-code platform into the new data model. No-code platforms use proprietary data formats. We handle the transformation so nothing is lost or corrupted.
All existing functionality rebuilt in code, plus 2–3 planned improvements scoped during discovery. We don't add speculative features, only improvements that are clearly worth doing as part of the migration.
Replicate the no-code system's behaviour in the new system and diff for discrepancies. We don't declare done until the new system produces the same outputs as the old system for a representative query set.
Run both systems in parallel, validate on real traffic, then cut over with a rollback plan. The no-code system stays live until the custom system has handled real production load without issues.
Stated clearly so there's no ambiguity about scope.
We don't migrate to another no-code platform, the goal is custom code you own outright.
We won't take a migration where the no-code tool is actually the right choice. If Zapier handles your volume at $50/month and you have no functional complaints, custom isn't worth it and we'll tell you that.
We don't build purely speculative improvements during the migration. Feature additions beyond the 2–3 scoped improvements are priced and built separately after the migration is complete.
Migrations are a significant investment. They make sense when the no-code ceiling is real and already costing you.
Teams happy with their no-code tool's current capabilities
Don't migrate to fix problems you don't have. If the platform does what you need and the limitations aren't blocking you, the migration cost isn't justified. Come back when you hit a wall.
Pre-revenue teams
No-code tools are the right choice until you hit their walls. If you haven't shipped to paying customers yet, the platform constraints aren't the problem. Build with the no-code tool first, migrate when you need to.
Anyone who wants to migrate and add 10 new features simultaneously
Scope the migration first, features second. Trying to redesign the product while migrating the implementation is how migrations fail. We migrate what exists, then build what's next.